Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2025-0089

“Evidence was heard that the mental health crisis staff do not appear to have appropriate…”

Dated 17 Feb 2025, from the coroner for Essex. Sent to 2 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

All responses published

Replies were due by 14 Apr 2025.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated17 Feb 2025
  2. Deadline14 Apr 2025
  3. Published on judiciary.uk18 Feb 2025
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Essex Partnership University NHS Trust”Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in February 2025.
Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Mid & South Essex NHS Trust”Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in February 2025.

The coroner’s concerns

– (1) Evidence was heard that the mental health crisis staff do not appear to have appropriate access to the primary care mental health System One records and there is a risk that vital information is not being shared. (2) The Operational Policy Mental Health Urgent Care Department pathways Appendices are not clear and do not appear to accord with the implementation. (3) Recent contact with the primary care mental health records did not appear to be accurately recorded in the System One Records with suicidal ideation not recorded. (4) Mr Bennett requested a GP appointment; a telephone appointment was made with the primary care mental health nurse. The primary care mental health nurse on 1st June did not escalate Mr Bennett to the GP or Community Psychiatrist when Mr Bennett was adamant he wanted to see a doctor and required an urgent medication review for his deteriorating mental health. (5) Mr Bennett had an open prescription for antipsychotic medication on his GP record that was not being requested and the primary care mental health nurse did not ask about this and the nurse did not inform the GP or seek any advice from her line manager who was a nurse prescriber. 2 (6) Mr Bennett attended the acute hospital Trust for his deteriorating mental health. The acute Trust hospital nurse sought advice from the mental health liaison nurse. The acute Trust nurse did not have access to the mental health or GP records and not all available information was shared with the acute Trust nurse. (7) The mental health liaison nurse asked the acute Trust nurse to undertake the risk assessment for Mr Bennett’s mental health. This is the role and purpose of mental health liaison.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2025-0089
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use