Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2025-0041

“Pain is not accurately assessed in people who are unable to communicate with words”

Dated 23 Dec 2024, from the coroner for East Riding and Hull. Sent to 3 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 17 Feb 2025. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated23 Dec 2024
  2. Deadline17 Feb 2025
  3. Published on judiciary.uk24 Jan 2025
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustResponse published, not yet matchedA response is published with this report. We haven’t yet matched it to the organisation it’s from, so it may be this one’s.
NHS EnglandResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in January 2025.
Care Quality CommissionResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in January 2025.

The coroner’s concerns

– (1) Pain is not accurately assessed in people who are unable to communicate with words. The court heard evidence that Mr Lodge at no point was provided pain relief, despite requests from the attending family member who was speaking on his behalf. An independent expert, a Consultant in Emergency Medicine, gave evidence that there was no evidence of reasonable adjustments in respect of assessing Mr Lodge’s pain to account for his baseline condition. (2) Basic examinations, including chest examinations, are not being carried out for learning disabled adults at risk of pneumonia in the emergency department. The treating physicians in evidence agreed that there should have been a high index of suspicion of pneumonia in Mr Lodge’s case and that it is one of the leading causes of death for people with learning disabilities. The court heard evidence that Mr Lodge did not have a chest examination carried out on him due to him not presenting any signs of respiratory distress. The independent expert gave evidence that a thorough examination should have been undertaken and that there was the opportunity to do so after the sedation medication was given. (3) NEWS2 scores above seven are not appropriately escalated for specialist advice. Clinical recommendations for 30 minute observations were not being followed. An independent expert, a Consultant in Intensive Care, gave evidence to the court that Mr Lodge should have been admitted to the Intensive Care Unit at Hull Royal Infirmary at which Mr Lodge would have undergone closer examinations on a lower patient to nurse ratio. (4) Opportunities for learning from serious incidents are being lost. No internal investigation or other form of serious incident investigation was undertaken. The court heard evidence from independent experts who opined that it would be expected, following a death in these circumstances, for there to have been an internal review to consider improvements to include input from a specialist with a learning disability team.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2025-0041
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use