Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2025-0033

“Following Mrs”

Dated 17 Jan 2025, from the coroner for Worcestershire. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

All responses published

Replies were due by 14 Mar 2025.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated17 Jan 2025
  2. Deadline14 Mar 2025
  3. Published on judiciary.uk20 Jan 2025
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

The coroner’s concerns

– 1) Following Mrs. Leeming’s surgery on 8.2.24, measures were put in place to prevent the formation of a deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. Those measures were prescriptions for anticoagulation medication ( Enoxaparin ) and for compression stockings. The inquest heard evidence that over the 46 days between the surgery and Mrs. Leeming’s death: (a) on 2 days ( 10 and 13.2.24 ) no documentation was completed by nurses to show whether Enoxaparin had in fact been administered; and 1 (b) on a total of 15 days ( including 5 consecutive days in one week ) no documentation was completed by nurses to show whether compression stockings had been fitted and were being worn; 2) It was of particular concern that for 5 consecutive days, no nurse had noticed or raised with a senior colleague that the prescription charts had not been completed to show that compression stockings had been fitted. This suggests either that there is little understanding of a nurse’s professional duty to report such omissions, or that the practice of not checking and completing such important documentation is commonplace; 3) The inquest heard evidence that whilst in its induction to new nurse employees, the Trust emphasises the importance of completing documentation, it is still heavily reliant on agency nurses, for whom it cannot be expected to provide such an induction; 4) I am concerned that the evidence in this case highlights that there is still insufficient awareness among employed and agency nurses at the Trust’s hospitals of their professional duty: (a) to complete important documentation such as prescription charts; and (b) to report any omissions in the completion of such documentation to a senior colleague.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2025-0033
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use