“Any National Early Warning Score (‘NEWS2’) should always be escalated”
Dated 28 Oct 2024, from the coroner for Inner North London. Sent to 1 organisation or person.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
All responses publishedReplies were due by 23 Dec 2024.
Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated28 Oct 2024
- Deadline23 Dec 2024
- Published on judiciary.uk1 Nov 2024
- Today23 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| East London NHS Foundation Trust | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in November 2024. |
The coroner’s concerns
1) Any National Early Warning Score (‘NEWS2’) should always be escalated. However, during Mr Ali’s time on Millharbour Ward he achieved a NEWS2 score on more than one occasion, which was not escalated to the nurse in charge for review. While this was not a causative factor in Mr Ali’s death, I consider that it creates significant risk for other patients in future, if not addressed. 2) During part of his on Millharbour Ward, Mr Ali was on one-to-one observations, requiring him to always be within the sight of a dedicated member of staff. Following Mr Ali’s death, it transpired that during this period of observations, designated members of staff were noted to preoccupied with the use of their personal mobile telephones at times, and on one occasion, the designated member of staff was sat on a chair with their back to Mr Ali’s door. While this was not a causative factor in Mr Ali’s death, I consider that such practices undermine patient safety and would place future patients at considerable risk. 3) The Trust noted, during its own serious incident investigation, that the quality of record keeping in relation to Mr Ali’s observations was not always accurate. Given the key role that accurate record-keeping plays in patient care within any healthcare setting, I formed the view that this also creates significant risk. I heard evidence that the Trust is taking the above matters seriously and that they are going to be addressed at Board level. However, it was acknowledged that there was still work to do to address the risks identified.
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2024-0582
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use