“(brief summary of matters of concern) 1) The medications were provided to the couple by…”
Dated 2 Jun 2024, from the coroner for Berkshire. Sent to 8 organisations or people.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
Report put online after its 56 daysOrganisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
judiciary.uk put this report online on 15 Oct 2024, after the 56 days for replies had ended (28 Jul 2024). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated2 Jun 2024
- Deadline28 Jul 2024
- Published on judiciary.uk15 Oct 2024
- Today23 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Slough Pharmacy | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in October 2024. |
| Berkshire Integrated Care Board | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in October 2024. |
| Community Pharmacy England | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in October 2024. |
| Local Pharmacy Commission | Response published, not yet matchedA response is published with this report. We haven’t yet matched it to the organisation it’s from, so it may be this one’s. |
| General Pharmaceutical Council | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in October 2024. |
| National Pharmaceutical Association | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in October 2024. |
| NHS Specialist Pharmacy Service | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in October 2024. |
| Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory AgencyNamed in the report as “Medication And Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency” | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in October 2024. |
The coroner’s concerns
(brief summary of matters of concern) 1) The medications were provided to the couple by the local pharmacy, then known as Lloyds Pharmacy, in separate dosset boxes. Mrs Chaddha’s medications were provided on a weekly basis. Mr Chaddha’s were provided on a monthly basis. (2) Both patients were elderly and had cognitive impairment. (3) The two patients’ dosset boxes were identical to each other except for a small pharmacist’s label with small type with the relevant patient’s name. (4) Mrs Chaddha used one of Mr Chaddha’s dosset boxes, rather than her own, for several days. (5) Evidence was given at the inquest that there was no guidance or policy in place for Pharmacists to follow when issuing medication to patients with cognitive impairments, or if there was, it was not well disseminated among the pharmacist population. (6) Evidence was given at the inquest that dosset boxes of different colours or labels with different colours were not routinely given to elderly or cognitively impaired patients living at the same address.
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2024-0552
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use