“(brief summary of matters of concern) In respect of Tees Esk and Wear Valley NHS…”

The coroner’s concerns

(brief summary of matters of concern) In respect of Tees Esk and Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust 1. I heard evidence that on 29 August 2023, the day after Mr Dulling had been assessed at home by two members of the Crisis Team, his wife contacted the All Age Crisis Line number she had been given. She spoke to a clinician from the Crisis Team and reported that she and her husband were outside their home address, he was angry and distressed and she needed help. The advice given to Mrs Dulling was to call the police if she was concerned for her safety. Mrs Dulling ended the call frustrated at the lack of practical OFFICIAL Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 advice and assistance. 2. Mr Dulling had been deemed to present a risk of harm to himself and others when assessed by Crisis Team members on 28 August 2023. My concern is that the call did not establish whether this risk had increased, such that Mental Health Act detention or other emergency intervention should be considered, nor offer practical advice to Mrs Dulling about taking her husband to an acute hospital or calling an ambulance, nor explain what assistance it was considered or anticipated could be provided by the police. 3. My concern is that a repetition of such a limited response could present a risk of future deaths to others. In respect of York & Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust – 4. I heard evidence of a number of omissions and lapses in the care afforded Mr Dulling by registered nurses during his admission to York District Hospital. My concerns relate to the following findings – a) No evidence of any direct inquiry being made of Mr Dulling’s primary carer in respect of his nutritional needs, despite Mr Dulling being deemed to lack capacity; b) It being recorded and acted upon that a regular diet was appropriate for Mr Dulling, despite a) above; c) No food chart being implemented and maintained despite the outcome of Mr Dulling’s malnutrition risk assessment; d) No assessment or escalation of Mr Dulling’s refusal of intravenous fluids; e) Evidence of a delayed response by a staff nurse to the information that Mr Dulling was choking; f) The absence of a de-brief of staff involved in the choking incident by a nurse of the requisite level within the period of 72 hours after the event. This, together with the subsequent delay in undertaking and completing the patient safety investigation review, resulted in important gaps in the evidence supplied both to the review and the inquest. 5. My concern is that the above reflects a series of lapses in basic nursing care identified in respect of a single patient, a repetition of any of which could present a risk of future deaths to others.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source

judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2024-0549

Added to Minute Book

8 Oct 2026

Reuse

We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0