Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2024-0536

“The inquest heard evidence that the locum SHO involved in the care of Mr Martin was 9…”

Dated 8 Oct 2024, from the coroner for Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

All responses published

Replies were due by 3 Dec 2024.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated8 Oct 2024
  2. Deadline3 Dec 2024
  3. Published on judiciary.uk10 Oct 2024
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS TrustNamed in the report as “Royal Cornwall Hospital”Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in October 2024.

The coroner’s concerns

1) The inquest heard evidence that the locum SHO involved in the care of Mr Martin was 9 days into a 3-4 month period of cover. She had not received any cardiology induction and was unaware of the Trust DAPT policy regarding PCI patients. It was accepted that while it was a challenge to ensure locums who covered 1-2 shifts had a thorough induction, where one was being asked to work in the service for an extended period of time, it was necessary that there was a proper induction process. The inquest heard changes have already been made in this regard. 2) There were multiple opportunities where the fact Mr Martin was receiving Aspirin only was not recognised. This included the completion of a WHO checklist intended to identify issues of this nature. Of greater concern is that a Deputy Sister who completed the cardiac cath lab pack did recognise the oversight but this was still not acted upon by medical colleagues.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2024-0536
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use