“Laura Farmer and her family found her diagnosis of an E coli infection difficult to…”

The coroner’s concerns

Laura Farmer and her family found her diagnosis of an E coli infection difficult to understand. She was a vegan who took great pains with food preparation. As a family, they were extremely hygiene conscious, particularly as has a nut allergy. When Ms Farmer became ill, her family members wanted to understand what had happened and to keep themselves as safe as possible. 1. Someone from what was described to me as public health (I assume the UKHSA) spoke to Laura Farmer the day before her death, asking for information. However, she was in intensive care at the time and not able to give a full, detailed picture. There was apparently no exploration of potential contact with animals or water sports and I was told that only scant details of a recent restaurant visit were obtained. 2. The UKHSA did not at any stage ask for information to assist in attempting to determine the source of the E coli infection that ultimately killed his wife. If asked, Mr Farmer would have explained that on 6 April 2024, not only did he and his wife visit a local restaurant, they also had drinks at a nearby club, and they had recently eaten and drunk at local military establishments. None of that information appears to have been considered by the UKHSA. 2 3. After his wife’s diagnosis, Mr Farmer was given no advice about how to keep himself and their child safe. He cleaned the bathroom in anticipation of his wife’s return home, but did not use any personal protective equipment. When he later became unwell, he did not know whether he had put himself at risk. Having heard his description in court, I think it is not an exaggeration to say that he was then terrified that his own actions might leave his child an orphan. 4. The clinicians treating Ms Farmer gave evidence at inquest that they did not know if the source of the infection that killed her had ever been identified. Mr Farmer saw in the news that there was a local E coli outbreak in Waverley, Surrey. The clinicians at UCLH knew which strain of E coli had infected Ms Farmer, but not whether that strain had been discovered in Waverley or indeed elsewhere, because after reporting to the UKHSA they received no feedback, no advice on infection control and no information they could give Mr Farmer. After a death from E coli, there seems to have been no closing of the loop of safety information that could have assisted those most closely involved. 5. Mr Farmer explained to me that he had spent some considerable time and effort since his wife’s death trying to obtain basic information from the public health authorities without success. He struck me as a person of significant drive, and yet he found it incredibly difficult to find the correct person to speak to and then incredibly difficult to gain any meaningful understanding of what had happened. This cannot inspire public confidence and seems a very offhand way to treat a grieving relative. I did not call anyone from the UKHSA to give evidence at inquest, because I had expected that UKHSA would have shared relevant information with both clinicians and family. It may be, therefore, that there are explanations for what seem to be surprising actions and inactions. If that is the case, then of course you will be able to explain as much in your response.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source

judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2024-0496

Added to Minute Book

8 Oct 2026

Reuse

We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0