Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2024-0427

“Although I received reassurance following the internal investigation that actions have…”

Dated 2 Aug 2024, from the coroner for County Durham and Darlington. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

All responses published

Replies were due by 27 Sep 2024.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated2 Aug 2024
  2. Deadline27 Sep 2024
  3. Published on judiciary.uk9 Aug 2024
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “North East Ambulance Service”Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in August 2024.

The coroner’s concerns

– (1) Although I received reassurance following the internal investigation that actions have been completed and lessons learnt in relation to this death, I remain concerned about the fact that the ambulance crew and paramedic were entirely unaware of the familiar faces plan in place for Sophie which contained crucially important information pertinent as to how best to assist her, secure her engagement and in relation to issues of both capacity and risk. I was told in evidence that the difficulty related to a data limit upon the electronic devices utilised by NEAS, and that therefore there should be a flag on electronic communications and that the control room would need to be contacted to obtain the additional information. NEAS were a signatory to the multi agency familiar face plan in this case which applies to them as well as a number of other agencies and was designed to assist in supporting the deceased and to reduce the risk of harm. (2) I am concerned that the information was not seen by the ambulance crew and paramedic who attended, and I am not reassured that it will be available to first responders on future occasions as it seems that the limits of the technology require the ambulance crew or paramedic to spot the flag and to contact the control room, presumably for a verbal account of the information only. I am concerned that in an emergency situation and when services are under such pressure that crucial information, such as a multi agency familiar face plan is not easily accessible to those attempting to offer assistance to some of the most vulnerable people in society. 2

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2024-0427
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use