Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2024-0373

“On a national level there is not a system which is capable of being operated in a way…”

Dated 15 Jul 2024, from the coroner for Hertfordshire. Sent to 2 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

All responses published

Replies were due by 9 Sep 2024.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated15 Jul 2024
  2. Deadline9 Sep 2024
  3. Published on judiciary.uk30 Jul 2024
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

The coroner’s concerns

– (a) On a national level there is not a system which is capable of being operated in a way which will ensure proper integrated healthcare for patients with T1DE. Specifically, there is no formal diagnosis for T1DE, no treatment pathway for T1DE and no complete treatment pathway for Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA), an acute clinical emergency associated with T1DE caused by deliberate omission of insulin, which should be seen as an act of self harm - there being a physical protocol, but no mental health protocol, for DKA. I heard independent evidence from , Professor of Psychiatry and Medicine at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences at Kings College London that " the lack of a diagnosis for T1DE has an impact because if you don’t know what you are looking for and there aren’t any criteria that you can screen by then it’s very difficult for both patients and clinicians to understand what is wrong with them and this has hampered development of recognition and treatment pathways and building the research evidence". (Copies of s independent expert reports for the Inquest are attached). (b) At a local level in East and North Hertfordshire there is no integrated healthcare system for patients with diabetes and eating disorder as there is in the west of the county. (c) Whilst there have been significant advances in developing shared clinical records systems across primary and secondary care since Ms Davison's death in 2017, none of the shared records systems extends to organisations which are deemed to be private providers, such as The Priory. The perception of healthcare providers such The Priory as "private" providers is a fallacy, because a high percentage of patients looked after by such providers are, like Ms Davison, NHS patients. I heard evidence from the Chief Medical Officer of The Priory that record sharing which includes private providers would help to prevent future deaths. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you, The Secretary of State for Health and the Officers of the Hertfordshire and West Essex Integrated Care Board have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 9th September 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2024-0373
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use