Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2024-0339

“is as follows”

Dated 25 Jun 2024, from the coroner for Manchester South. Sent to 3 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 20 Aug 2024. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated25 Jun 2024
  2. Deadline20 Aug 2024
  3. Published on judiciary.uk27 Jun 2024
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Manchester City CouncilResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in June 2024.
East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS TrustNamed in the report as “East Midlands Ambulance Service”Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in June 2024.
Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustResponse published, not yet matchedA response is published with this report. We haven’t yet matched it to the organisation it’s from, so it may be this one’s.

The coroner’s concerns

is as follows. – (1) The inquest heard that there has been a change in policy with regards to the timing of discharge of patients from Manchester Royal Infirmary in circumstances where a patient is unable to manage independently when they arrive home. However, the Inquest heard that late discharges were still happening. In addition, the Inquest heard that the East Midlands Ambulance Service were unaware of the change in discharge timings. (2) Completion of the Serious Incident Review was delayed, and the report contained factual inaccuracies, giving rise to a concern relating to the approach taken by Manchester City Council to Serious Incident Reviews.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2024-0339
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use