“I heard extensive evidence on the practice of preparing hospital discharge summaries over…”
Dated 12 Apr 2024, from the coroner for Blackpool and Fylde. Sent to 2 organisations or people.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
All responses publishedReplies were due by 7 Jun 2024.
Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated12 Apr 2024
- Deadline7 Jun 2024
- Published on judiciary.uk29 Apr 2024
- Today22 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Blackpool Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust” | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in April 2024. |
| Department of Health and Social Care | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in April 2024. |
The coroner’s concerns
I heard extensive evidence on the practice of preparing hospital discharge summaries over the two days of the inquest. I heard that doctors commonly start to prepare discharge documentation before a patient is ready for discharge. I found that this occurred across disciplines and hospitals given that now works at the Royal Preston Hospital as a Consultant where I heard the practice also takes place. The rationale explained to me was that discharge summaries were created early and worked on throughout patient stays. This was to save time and to prevent lengthy summaries being written at the end of long stays for patients. I heard from , Head of General Internal Medicine at the Blackpool Victoria Hospital that each doctor’s practice is different and it is for individual doctors to decide how they create and complete discharge summaries. I found that there is no process or procedure for discharge summaries to be created prior to discharge taking place at the Blackpool Victoria Hospital. In this case, created the document on 20th January 2023 before Sabina underwent the ERCP procedure. This document indicated that the patient was discharged on medical advice when in fact she self-discharged against medical advice. The section on ERCP was left blank intending to be completed after the procedure took place and set out that Sabina was well in herself upon discharge with pain settling. As the discharge summary was prepared prior to the ERCP taking place it could not be known whether Sabina was well in herself or that her pain was settling. mistakenly clicked on the completed button rather than the save button on 20 January 2023. There is no mechanism for the IT system to double check the document is completed before marking the document as complete. The draft th 2 discharge summary was sent by staff on 24th January 2023 after Sabina’s selfdischarge on 23rd January 2023. Staff members believed that it was ready to be sent as it was marked complete by accepted in her evidence that a draft discharge summary was sent to Sabina’s GP Practice in error and told me that her revised practice is that she instructs her junior doctors to mark the discharge summaries as drafts. I heard evidence that Blackpool Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust are undertaking a review which hasn’t yet commenced. This will look at the development of a policy of how discharge summaries are prepared. This will also include a review of the IT system with regard to creating and completing discharge summaries. I found it very concerning to hear that speculative information in Sabrina’s case was placed on the discharge summary before her procedure took place. There is a risk that this could occur again and in the future this may be significant for a patient’s treatment and care. I found that the sending of a draft discharge summary to Sabina’s GP Practice by Blackpool Victoria Hospital didn’t contribute to Sabina’s death. I found that a correctly completed and finalised discharge summary wouldn’t have changed the steps taken by on 25th January 2023 who was told by the patient that she was improving. It is however, of vital importance that GPs receive timely and accurate discharge summaries from hospitals which may be significant in other cases. For that reason and not withstanding the review or audit that is about to commence at the Blackpool Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, I consider my duty to prevent future deaths is triggered and that there is a risk to of deaths in the future from this practice which is commonplace and neither medical specialism or hospital specific. I found that these matters gave rise to a risk of future deaths and engaged my duty under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2024-0214
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use