“The adequacy of arrangements in place at Farnham Road Hospital to assess and manage…”
Dated 22 Dec 2023, from the coroner for Surrey. Sent to 1 organisation or person.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
All responses publishedOrganisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated22 Dec 2023
- Deadline16 Feb 2024
- Published on judiciary.uk26 Feb 2024
- Today23 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Surrey and Boarders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust” | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in February 2024. |
The coroner’s concerns
a. The adequacy of arrangements in place at Farnham Road Hospital to assess and manage inpatients risk. b. Use (or non-use) of anti-anxiety medication in relation to the support of Mr. SPRIGGS' symptoms. c. Passage of information between staff concerning patients care and treatment. d. The adequacy of arrangements to manage and implement the intermittent observation regime at Farnham Road Hospital. e. Processes for the management of incidents at Farnham Road Hospital such as those on the 27th May 2021 when Mr. SPRIGGS fell from the window of his room. I received further evidence orally and in writing from the Interested Persons’ subsequent to the completion of the Inquest in relation to these concerns. This evidence included a response from Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (SABP). The Trust outlined a number of prospective measures it is either considering the implementation of, or has plans for their implementation. These measures included: 1. The Trust was reviewing its risk assessment policy, including a new risk assessment tool. 2. Training and induction packages have been reviewed and revised for staff, including junior doctors and temporary ward staff. 3. A draft Care Planning Principles Policy has been developed. 4. The 10 Key Steps to Safety handover document used by the Trust has been reviewed and revised. 5. The Observation Competency Checklist has been changed following review. 6. The Trust is implementing the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS). It was explained to the court that these measures should be seen in the context of wider cultural change management being undertaken by the Trust at Farnham Road Hospital. 4 I have taken account of the measures, many of which are prospective, as outlined by SABP. However, I remain concerned in relation to the matters identified at sub-paragraphs a to d (above). In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: Evidence of the cultural change in the delivery of care and treatment of patients, accepted by the Trust as required, was not provided to the court; either in the form of a plan to bring such change about, or evidence that such change has otherwise occurred. The adequacy of arrangements in place at Farnham Road Hospital to assess and manage inpatients risk, including the prescription of anti-anxiety medication. Passage of information between staff concerning patients care and treatment. The adequacy of arrangements to manage and implement intermittent observation at Farnham Road Hospital.
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2024-0104
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use