Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2024-0059

“On 28 August Ms Dehaney-Perkins was agitated and distressed on return to the ward from…”

Dated 5 Feb 2024, from the coroner for Essex. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

All responses published

Replies were due by 1 Apr 2024.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated5 Feb 2024
  2. Deadline1 Apr 2024
  3. Published on judiciary.uk14 Feb 2024
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Essex Partnership NHS Trust”Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in February 2024.

The coroner’s concerns

– (1) On 28 August Ms Dehaney-Perkins was agitated and distressed on return to the ward from leave and had consumed alcohol that was known to increase her risk of self-harm. . Staff found Ms DehaneyPerkins and removed the ligature. a. Ms Dehaney-Perkins was admitted to a room with an assisted bathroom (this was not a requirement for her) with a fault in the antiligature safety mechanism meant that the safety feature could not be implemented. b. There was no risk assessment about the suitability of this room for Ms Dehaney-Perkins a patient with a self-harming history at the time of the admission. c. The fixed-point ligature was not appropriately updated in the risk assessment and was not discussed at a discharge planning meeting. d. The Trust Datix Report was incomplete (2) Medication was appropriately withheld on 28 August when Ms DehaneyPerkins returned to the ward intoxicated due to potential interaction with alcohol that can cause increased sedation, (3) arrhythmia and fatality. a. This risk of consuming alcohol with her specific medication was not 2 discussed with the Ms Dehaney-Perkins or family. b. Not all incidents of consumption of alcohol on return from leave were recorded and risk assessments were not updated. c. Ms Dehaney-Perkins had agreed to mitigations of medication management by her family that were not recorded on the care plan on discharge on 2 September. Ms Dehaney-Perkins demanded control of her medication on 4 September against concerns of her family who were forced to return medication. (4) The Home First Treatment Team attended a scheduled appointment on 4 September and Ms Dehaney-Perkins appeared stable and updated the risk assessment that the risk of self-harm remained significant when alcohol was consumed. No action was taken following a call raising some queries and concerns from family that evening that Ms DehaneyPerkins had left her home with her medication.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2024-0059
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use