“The main issue of this inquest was to try to ascertain exactly how the wardrobe came to…”
Dated 30 Jan 2024, from the coroner for East Riding and Hull. Sent to 1 organisation or person.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
All responses publishedReplies were due by 26 Mar 2024.
Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated30 Jan 2024
- Deadline26 Mar 2024
- Published on judiciary.uk12 Feb 2024
- Today23 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in February 2024. |
The coroner’s concerns
– 1. The main issue of this inquest was to try to ascertain exactly how the wardrobe came to be on top of Mrs White and evidence was heard on the subject. As the evidence neared its conclusion a comment was made regarding discharge summaries and the role they play in updating risk assessments for carers. 2. I am fully aware that the hospital did not have the opportunity to put forward any information on this point, however it is my statutory duty to make a report to prevent future death, and the evidence in this case was that this was an issue that occurred regularly. 3. Prior to this incident occurring Mrs White had been in hospital and discharged on 4th October 2023. A manager for the care home outlined that the paperwork provided to carers known as the “Discharge Summary” is often inadequate in providing suitable information. In this instance I was informed it did not provide any information on Mrs White’s increased frailty and decreased mobility. This means that information provided is inappropriate for ongoing risk assessments. 4. The manager did outline a particular form that they prefer, I make no comment regarding the format of the information required, merely the need for appropriate information to allow risk assessments to take place. 5. The manager stated that a social worker should be completing a risk assessment prior to discharge but this often does not happen. In many cases a doctor or another member of staff will complete a discharge summary. The information in these is often lacking to safeguard the welfare of the person concern with regard to their care needs. The manager stated they often have to alert safeguarding at the local authority of the deficit. 6. Bearing in mind the importance of a discharge summary in providing the foundation information for the ongoing safe care of patients as they leave the hospital environment, this is an issue where either a structured approach is required or training to those who are failing to complete them correctly is required. 3
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2024-0044
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use