“There was a ten day delay in Ms Chappell’s transfer from the Princess Royal Hospital to…”

The coroner’s concerns

1. There was a ten day delay in Ms Chappell’s transfer from the Princess Royal Hospital to UCLH. I was told that this might have been because of a lack of beds, but it might also have been because of confusion about which UCLH site was the accepting surgeon’s preferred destination, a confusion that was understood at the time by the Princess Royal to be a rejection of the transfer. 2. From at least 16 June 2023, the consultant urology surgeon in charge of Ms Chappell’s care was very firmly of the view that he was not the best clinician to fulfil this role. He had long since correctly determined that she had not sustained a ruptured bladder, and thus considered that her care belonged with the gastroenterologists or the general surgeons. Despite the agreement on 16 June of the gastroenterology clinical director that Ms Chappell’s care should be led by the gastroenterologists, they had not taken over her care by the time of her death, and there had not even been a conversation between the gastroenterology and general surgery consultants about the transfer of care. 3. There was a frequent misunderstanding among the medical staff that Ms Chappell’s issues were all chronic. Her acute situation was often not properly handed over or understood by her consultants. 2 4. Whilst at UCLH, the pain relief offered to Ms Chappell (principally simply paracetamol) was completely inadequate. At night, her buzzer was taken away from her and her door was shut. 5. The management of the nasogastric tube that was crucial in attempting to avoid a fatal aspiration was inappropriate. The tube in situ that was operating effectively was removed approximately ten days before her death. Her abdomen became extremely distended. A further tube placement was not attempted until the day before she died. When this proved beyond the nurses’ skillset, a doctor was not called to assist until the following afternoon. By then, two experienced doctors were unable to insert a tube and, as they were attending her (with her mother present), their patient suffered a massive aspiration and died shortly afterwards. I was told at inquest that if the nasogastric tube had been passed at an earlier point, this would have been done successfully and the fatal cardiac arrest would have been avoided. 6. This death occurred almost six months ago, but no proper trust investigation has taken place, no change in policies or procedures has been agreed, and the systems at UCLH remain largely what they were on the day that Sarah Chappell died.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source

judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2023-0523

Added to Minute Book

8 Oct 2026

Reuse

We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0