Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2023-0488

“Secretary of State for Health (1) That over 75% of patients receiving hospital care are…”

Dated 27 Nov 2023, from the coroner for Avon. Sent to 4 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 22 Jan 2024. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated27 Nov 2023
  2. Deadline22 Jan 2024
  3. Published on judiciary.uk6 Dec 2023
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Department of Health and Social CareDeadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 22 Jan 2024. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
Bristol Ambulance Emergency Medical ServicesResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in December 2023.
Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation TrustDeadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 22 Jan 2024. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustDeadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 22 Jan 2024. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

The coroner’s concerns

– Secretary of State for Health (1) That over 75% of patients receiving hospital care are 65 and over. There is a conflict and tension between where within the hospital those patients should be receiving their care. A proportion of these patients require admission to a surgical ward due to the elements of their care which require surgical oversight and management, for example, analgesia through an epidural, insertion of a chest drain. However, this group of patients have multiple co-morbidities and complexities due to their age, which would be better managed by a medical team specialising in care of the elderly. Whilst medical teams can review patients, their limited resources mean it may not be as quickly as it needs to be, and they cannot be proactive in following up on the care of these patients. This results in an increasing risk that these patients will not receive the care they need in a timely manner. There is an increasing need for more doctors specialising in the care of older persons and this is a national issue. (2) There are currently no clear guidelines as to how these patients should best be managed and there remains a serious risk that the care they receive is not holistic. (3) Patients falling in hospitals and sustaining injuries which lead to their death remains a matter of grave concern. Bristol Ambulance Emergency Medical Services (4) The paramedic working within the cohort area did not complete a falls risk assessment in accordance with the JRCALC guidelines following the admission of a patient who had just had a fall at home. (5) The other two ambulance staff did not seem to understand that Mr Cruse was a falls risk, they did not consider that he was at a greater risk of falls and did not consider that any further action should have been considered or taken. (6) An investigation took place but the staff did not identify any learning and did not undertake the case study to help them identify such patients in the future. Bristol Ambulance Emergency Medical Services still run some cohort areas alongside South Western Ambulance NHS Foundation Trust, and continue to convey patients to hospital. The evidence given on behalf of this organisation did not provide reassurance that this is a matter which the ambulance service have adequately addressed. There is a real concern that ambulance staff throughout the organisation may not be adequately trained in recognising and dealing with patients who have had a fall or falls.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2023-0488
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use