Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2023-0336

“In the course of the inquest, I heard evidence that: 1) Bluebird Care provided care at…”

Dated 18 Sep 2023, from the coroner for Worcestershire. Sent to 3 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 13 Nov 2023. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated18 Sep 2023
  2. Deadline13 Nov 2023
  3. Published on judiciary.uk18 Sep 2023
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Bluebird CareResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in September 2023.
Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS TrustResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in September 2023.
Divine Health ServicesDeadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 13 Nov 2023. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

The coroner’s concerns

– In the course of the inquest, I heard evidence that: 1) Bluebird Care provided care at home for Mr. Friend up to 16.4.23 ( two days before the accident which led to Mr. Friend’s death ); 2) the reason Bluebird Care stopped providing care for Mr. Friend was that they had concerns about the sling which was still being used with his hoist; 3) Bluebird Care knew by 12.4.23 that Mr. Friend’s care at home after 16.4.23 would be provided by Divine Health Services Ltd.; 4) At no time did Bluebird Care try to make contact with, or provide any sort of handover to Divine Health Services Ltd. about Mr. Friend’s needs, or about any concerns they had concerning the sling. In her evidence to the inquest, 1 , Bluebird Care’s registered care manager, agreed that it was “common sense…for there to be a good handover between care agencies”, but that it “was not something which we had ever done”.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2023-0336
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use