Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2023-0157

“I am concerned that the jury have found that the risk assesments and risk planning for…”

Dated 16 May 2023, from the coroner for Manchester South. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

All responses published

Replies were due by 11 Jul 2023.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated16 May 2023
  2. Deadline11 Jul 2023
  3. Published on judiciary.uk17 May 2023
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Pennine Care NHS Foundation TrustResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in May 2023.

The coroner’s concerns

– 1. I am concerned that the jury have found that the risk assesments and risk planning for Carl’s s.17 leave in March 2023 was inadequate. This issue was not addressed in the Trusts’ internal investigation conducted by and I have not received any evidence that there have been reflections or changes following Carl’s deathon this issue to reassure me that there is not a continuing risk of future deaths. 2. I am concerned that the Trust’s own internal review found that whilst Carl was on leave from the 7th March, the clinical team were made aware of an increase in Carl’s risk factors when contacted by his motherwho outlined her concerns. 3. The review concluded that this represented a missed opportunity for the clinical team to understand how several factors may be combining to increase the risk for Carl, including his use of nonprescriptionmedication and illicit substance misuse. 4. The Trust’s own review concluded that the clinical team could have sought to understand these risk factors through direct contact with Carl. 5. The Trusts own review concluded that following such direct contact, consultation could have been sought with others within a legal framework to ask Carl to return to the ward with support from services or family. The review concluded that the nursing team could have escalated this information via the on-call system for further medical support. 6. The review concluded that a risk to Carl’s physical health was present especially in view of research and evidence for substance misusers starting to use again after periods of abstaining. 7. I am concerned that on the 9th March, Carl should have been seen 2 face to face by the CMHT, in line with Trust Policy. Instead he only received a telephone call from a duty worker who had never met him. 8. I am concerned that prior to his commencing leave on the 7th March, Carl had not been allocated a CMHT Care Coordinator, despite being an inpatient for over 3 months, since 31st December 2021. 9. 6 gave evidence that although the Trust Review had identified a number of missed opportunites, the Trust Action plan, which contained 6 Action points was still “In progess”. was not able to identify a single action point that had been completed to date.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2023-0157
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use