Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2023-0139

“That the GP summary did not contain pertinent psychiatric history that would have…”

Dated 26 Apr 2023, from the coroner for Inner West London. Sent to 3 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 21 Jun 2023. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated26 Apr 2023
  2. Deadline21 Jun 2023
  3. Published on judiciary.uk3 May 2023
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “St Georges University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust”Deadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 21 Jun 2023. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
The Roehampton SurgeryDeadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 21 Jun 2023. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
NHS South West London Integrated Care BoardDeadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 21 Jun 2023. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

The coroner’s concerns

1. That the GP summary did not contain pertinent psychiatric history that would have assisted the hospital clinicians to identify Mrs Leaver's depression and specifically her suicidality. 2, That doctors at SGH do not take a reasonable psychiatric history as part of their clerking and thus fail to make a proper holistic assessment of the patient and potentially miss the opportunity to manage risks such as those in this case which may lead to death. 3, That doctors at SGH need training on the information available on HIE and how to access it. 4. That NHS South West London Integrated Care Board has made no formal provision for psychiatric liaison cover at QMH, despite there being such a clear clinical need for this that the team from psychiatric liaison have felt compelled to provide informal telephone advice for the last 10 years. 5. That the lack of formal psychiatric advice availability at QMH puts vulnerable patients at increased risk, since the only way to properly access such advice is for them to be sent by LAS ambulance to A&E at SGH, when they are physically frail, given that QMH is a rehabilitation unit.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2023-0139
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use