“The conduct of the Trust Serious Incident Investigation – there are outstanding concerns…”
Dated 20 Jul 2022, from the coroner for Nottinghamshire. Sent to 1 organisation or person.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
All responses publishedOrganisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated20 Jul 2022
- Deadline14 Sep 2022
- Published on judiciary.uk28 Sep 2022
- Today23 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in September 2022. |
The coroner’s concerns
– 1. The conduct of the Trust Serious Incident Investigation – there are outstanding concerns regarding the methodology, findings and conclusions in this case. The Investigation in my view was flawed in a number of serious ways as follows: • It was undertaken without including, nor giving due weight to, the family evidence, in the analysis and conclusions of the report It was undertaken without any immediate written accounts taken of what had happened, and very limited and delayed interviews of key staff involved The Trust commissioned an expert to assist with the Investigation. This was provided by a well respected Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology recommended expert, and was then ignored, simply because there were aspects of the expert report that the Trust did not accept. All of these omissions in the Investigation process, led to serious omissions in the analysis, conclusions, recommendations and actions that followed in the report, in my view. Also, the Trust, on the evidence of Dr , Executive Medical Director, likely did not share with either the CCG or the CQC, the fact that they had received a detailed, but critical, expert report, that they had not included, nor referred to in the final Investigation report. At the Hearing, there was no reflection on this latter issue by senior Trust staff, no acceptance that the inadequacies of the report had caused huge distress to the family, and more importantly insufficient learning. If there is insufficient learning from a tragic and avoidable death such as this, what reassurance is there that there will be sufficient learning by the Trust in the future. In my mind this poses a continuing risk of similar deaths occurring in the future if the Investigation process does not change. 2. Insufficient support for newly appointed Obstetric Consultants. The Obstetric Consultant who was on call when Jade died, was newly appointed. She was dealing with an extremely complex and challenging situation, yet did not call for help at an early point, when Jade had had a prolonged cardiac arrest, following the uterine inversion. Whilst I accept that it is unrealistic to expect there to be a second Consultant on call every night or weekend to provide additional support, there does need to be a robust system of mentoring, and access to a senior consultant for prompt advice out of hours for at least one year post consultant appointment, and beyond, when serious emergencies such as this arise.
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2022-0228
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use