“In the months prior to his death, Spencer had been under the care of multiple agencies…”

The coroner’s concerns

- 1. In the months prior to his death, Spencer had been under the care of multiple agencies, including Referral Management Team (RMC) (part of Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust), as well as the addiction service Change Grow Live (CGL); the Young Adults Central Team of the Probation Service; and Forward Thinking Birmingham. 2. I heard evidence that full circumstances surrounding Spencer's deterioration and drug relapse in November 2021 - namely that he had received a significant back payment of benefits totalling over £5,000 from the DWP resulting in him purchasing drugs and overdosing - were not adequately conveyed between agencies, and as such agencies were unaware of the heightened risk of potential self harm and death that was posed by these circumstances. Inter-agency co-operation therefore appears to be inadequate, and consideration should be given to ensuring clinicians receive better training when it comes to the sharing of relevant information between agencies. 3. I heard evidence that Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust are now taking steps to improve intra-agency co-operation in an attempt to mitigate against the risk of further deaths in the future. However, I heard evidence that other agencies may not be aware of their own limitations when it comes to inter-agency co-operation. For instance, CGL gave evidence that they had no concerns regarding their co-operation with other services, but Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust indicated that the connections between their respective agencies was poor. I am therefore concerned that there is no universal approach being taken by all agencies to improve inter-agency cooperation, and consideration should be given to the formation of a working group being set up between all agencies to ensure a coordinated approach is taken. 4. Additionally, I am concerned that there appear to be no central points of contact for agencies to facilitate that co-operation. I heard evidence that CGL has no central point of contact for referrals being made/to allow sharing of information - instead relying on information being conveyed via specific individuals. I am therefore concerned that where there is no central point of contact, there is a risk of information not being passed on in a timely manner when a specified person is absent from work for whatever reason. Consideration should be given to central points of contact being created within each agency, and ensuring that those points of contact are shared between agencies to ensure information can flow freely between them. 5. Furthermore, I heard evidence that certain organisations do not accept direct referrals or share information between agencies. For instance, I heard that CGL solely depend on referrals from GP practices and do not allow referrals direct from other agencies. Consideration therefore should be given as to whether there a better system of interagency referral is possible and feasible.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source

judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2022-0142

Added to Minute Book

8 Oct 2026

Reuse

We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0