“That restrictions in cardiac surgical capacity at SGH is causing patients to be diverted…”
Dated 9 May 2022, from the coroner for Inner West London. Sent to 2 organisations or people.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
All responses publishedReplies were due by 4 Jul 2022.
Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated9 May 2022
- Deadline4 Jul 2022
- Published on judiciary.uk10 May 2022
- Today23 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “St George’s Hospital” | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in May 2022. |
| NHS EnglandNamed in the report as “NHS England & NHS Improvement” | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in May 2022. |
The coroner’s concerns
1. That restrictions in cardiac surgical capacity at SGH is causing patients to be diverted to other overstretched units, increasing their risk of death. 2. That emergency patients being diverted away from SGH has resulted in unnecessary deaths. 3. That public confidence has been so dented that patients requiring care have been discouraged from presenting to SGH thus increasing their risk of death. 4. That the evidentially inadequate and critical SJR process has failed to identify factors from which lessons could have been learnt and thus patient safety improved, and future deaths prevented. 5. That this SJR process has undermined the department unnecessarily, impacting on morale and the mental health and confidence of the cardiac surgeons and other clinicians and non-clinicians within SGH which may translate into a lower quality of care for patients. 6. That the apparently unnecessary restrictions on operating rights of the cardiac surgeons is reducing the overall capacity for cardiac surgery and thus may increase the risk of death for patients awaiting such surgery, as they die on waiting lists. 7. That the apparently unfounded damage to the reputation of the cardiac surgery department will take years to repair, increasing the risks of future deaths by damaging public confidence in SGH and the NHS. 8. That restrictions on training, collapse of research and staff leaving, further damages not only the cardiac surgery at SGH but also the wider cardiac surgery field, increasing the risk of death to patients by reducing their access to high quality care. 9. The restrictions at SGH may make surgeons more risk adverse and thus deny care to the most complex patients and so increase the risk of future deaths. 10. That the SJR process as deployed in SGH is not fit for purpose, further undermining the public confidence in the NHS, which the public may perceive as the NHS being unable to appropriately audit its own work.
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2022-0135
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use