Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2022-0079

“The care package arranged for Melanie following discharge from lengthy in-patient…”

Dated 7 Mar 2022, from the coroner for Surrey. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 2 May 2022. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated7 Mar 2022
  2. Deadline2 May 2022
  3. Published on judiciary.uk16 Mar 2022
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation TrustDeadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 2 May 2022. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

The coroner’s concerns

– 1. The care package arranged for Melanie following discharge from lengthy in-patient admission was not followed and was altered to something which the treating doctor did not consider adequate. 2. The walk book was not properly completed. 3. There was no extra planning for changes in circumstances: Melanie faced never being allowed to return to family life with her husband and son due to Child In Need proceedings; changes in medication and less support from family due to the Social Services requirements. 4. There was no missing person plan in place with timeframe and steps of escalation for Melanie’s leave. 5. Risk assessment prior to leave was not adequate. 6. Risk assessment prior to leave was not recorded.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2022-0079
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use