“The approach of the Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Team of considering their role to be…”
Dated 14 Oct 2021, from the coroner for Nottinghamshire. Sent to 1 organisation or person.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
All responses publishedReplies were due by 9 Dec 2021.
Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated14 Oct 2021
- Deadline9 Dec 2021
- Published on judiciary.uk18 Oct 2021
- Today23 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in October 2021. |
Some responses were published as scans, so their text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.
The coroner’s concerns
(1) The approach of the Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Team of considering their role to be limited to avoiding the need for patients to receive inpatient treatment. The primary role of any medical professional ought to be the protection of life, but within the written and oral evidence from the CRHTT the focus was on prevention of hospital admission alone. (2) This inquest was one of a number of inquests I have conducted where staff members from Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust have placed great reliance upon their interpretation of a patient’s intention and / or a patient’s denial of ongoing suicidal intention. This is so even where, as was the case for Mr Barton, there is a clear and established pattern of fluctuating and contradictory intentions and desires towards suicide. (3) The quality of the Trust’s own investigation into the circumstances of Mr Barton’s death. It failed to identify themes of concern. It included many false and inaccurate statements, failed to challenge false assumptions made at the time and introduced new false information which was not taken from any available records. It caused distress to the family and did not reassure me that the Trust had taken an appropriate response to the concerning facts of this case.
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2021-0338
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use