Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2021-0183

“There is no formal guidance or process in place at the Trust for Consultant Psychiatrists…”

Dated 28 May 2021, from the coroner for Manchester North. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

All responses published

Replies were due by 23 Jul 2021.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated28 May 2021
  2. Deadline23 Jul 2021
  3. Published on judiciary.uk2 Jun 2021
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Pennine Care NHS Foundation TrustResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in June 2021.

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

- (1) There is no formal guidance or process in place at the Trust for Consultant Psychiatrists to seek a second opinion in relation to diagnosis, treatment plans or whether a patient meets the criteria for detention under the Mental Health Act. The evidence was that whilst there is nothing to prohibit a Consultant requesting a second Opinion, it rarely happens in practice. (2) There is no formal guidance or process in place at the Trust for health care professionals or family members to seek a second opinion in relation to the matters set out above. (3) The court heard evidence that there is a lack of understanding on the part of in-patient Consultants as to rules around confidentiality and the nature/extent of permissible communication with family members ie: the difference between receiving information which might inform diagnosis, treatment and risk planning and discussions which involve sharing confidential health information. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely 23 July 2021. |, the Area Coroner, may extend the period.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2021-0183
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use