Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2021-0023

“Mrs Tadman had dementia and a long-term catheter who was admitted to hospital with a…”

Dated 1 Feb 2021, from the coroner for Mid Kent and Medway. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

All responses published

Replies were due by 29 Mar 2021.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated1 Feb 2021
  2. Deadline29 Mar 2021
  3. Published on judiciary.uk4 Feb 2021
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Medway NHS Foundation TrustResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in February 2021.

The coroner’s concerns

– 1. Mrs Tadman had dementia and a long-term catheter who was admitted to hospital with a pre-alert for suspicion for urosepsis that was treated appropriately. However, urine dipstick tests were only positive for blood and consideration was not given to the circumstances in which she was found with a history of a fall. 2. Evidence was heard at the inquest that ambulance crew noted and handed over Mrs Tadman’s left leg was rotated but not shortened. Mrs Tadman could not stand or mobilise to use the commode in hospital. No consideration was given to a potential fracture injury. 3. Mrs Tadman was an elderly lady with a medical history of osteoporosis who fell from a standing height. No imaging was conducted on admission to hospital to establish if Mrs Tadman had sustained an injury. 4. Swelling in the calves gave rise to a suspicion of potential deep vein thrombosis and dalteparin was prescribed. Physical examination was over reliant on the lack of complaints of pain in a patient with dementia in the absence of imaging. 5. There was no consideration of potential fracture or internal bleeding in the presence of dropping of haemoglobin and continued deterioration. 6. The Trust did not conduct a serious incident investigation following Mrs Tadman’s death when the post-mortem cause of death established a pelvic fracture with severe haemorrhage. Evidence heard at the inquest confirmed that this case was not discussed at the trust morbidity and mortality review or any other forum giving rise to concerns that lessons had not been learned.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2021-0023
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use