Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2020-0199

“S are as follows: Whilst there has been a detailed Serious Incident review of the…”

Dated 25 Sep 2020, from the coroner for Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Report put online after its 56 days

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

judiciary.uk put this report online on 30 Nov 2020, after the 56 days for replies had ended (20 Nov 2020). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated25 Sep 2020
  2. Deadline20 Nov 2020
  3. Published on judiciary.uk30 Nov 2020
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustResponse published, not yet matchedA response is published with this report. We haven’t yet matched it to the organisation it’s from, so it may be this one’s.

The coroner’s concerns

S are as follows: Whilst there has been a detailed Serious Incident review of the circumstances of Mrs Day’s death conducted by the Trust, it remains unclear as to how and why these prescription errors occurred. It is my view that a similar prescription error could occur again, as there remains a number of different charts and documents that allow for muddled prescribing of, or omission of, anticoagulants, when there are complex medical conditions and concern re likely bleeding. Whilst the development of an electronic prescribing system may increase the probability of more clarity in prescription of anticoagulants, this is not in place currently. In addition, this alone in my view will not ensure oversight of anticoagulant management, unless other measures are taken to ensure senior review of patients, and a clear prescription plan recorded for all staff to follow. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 20 November 2020. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2020-0199
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use