Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2020-0159

“First Concern 1”

Dated 14 Aug 2020, from the coroner for West Sussex. Sent to 2 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Report put online after its 56 days

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

judiciary.uk put this report online on 22 Oct 2020, after the 56 days for replies had ended (9 Oct 2020). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated14 Aug 2020
  2. Deadline9 Oct 2020
  3. Published on judiciary.uk22 Oct 2020
  4. Today29 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
NHS EnglandResponse published, not yet matchedA response is published with this report. We haven’t yet matched it to the organisation it’s from, so it may be this one’s.
Public Health EnglandResponse published, not yet matchedA response is published with this report. We haven’t yet matched it to the organisation it’s from, so it may be this one’s.

The coroner’s concerns

– First Concern 1. Mrs Elmer attended St Richards Hospital, Chichester, for elective surgery. She had attended the hosptial for a Pre Operation Assessment on 25th April 2019 and was admitted for her surgery on 30th April 2019. Whilst attending the hospital she acquired a Listeria infection from a chicken sandwich although this was not know at the time. Mr Elmer did not live in Sussex and following her treatment she returned home to Kent on 3rd May 2019. 2. Western Sussex Hosptial Trust, NHS England and Public Health England (PHE) first become aware of a possible outbreak on Listeria on 19th May 2019 when blood cultures from another patient ast the Worthing Hospital site confirmed a listeria infection. On 26th May 2019 NHS England notified all hosptials of a national outbreak of Listeria and a possible link to sandwiches that has been provided by the Good Food Company, a supplier to a number of Trusts. 3. Whilst it was accepted that details of the possible outbreak were shared locally with other medical professionals (and therefore there was a local knowledge of the Listeria outbreak) there did not appear to be any attempt by NHS England or PHE (by way of a Public Health message) to communicate with those patients who were treated within the Trust but who were now out of the area in different parts of the Country. 4. It was unfortunately that when Mrs Elmer fell ill, neither her GP who initially treated her, nor her family had any idea that her illness may be connected to the Listeria outbreak. This meant that she was not prioritised for a blood test and this delayed her being treated appropriately for Listeriosis. This diagnosis was only made when she was admitted to Tunbridge Wells Hospital, her local hospital in Kent following an emergency admission. It is unknown whether earlier treatment would have changed the outcome but it may have eased Mrs Elmer’s sufferning. 5. Consideration needs to be given to how communications should be disseminated following such an outbreak so that as many patients as possible, who had been in the hospital at the relevant time, are made aware and can seek medical assistance if they become unwell. Second Concern. 1. During the course of the Inquest evidence was given by the representative of Public Health England that there was no legal requirement for Private Laboraties who identifiy Listeria in food to share the Listeria isolate with PHE or indeed keep this isoloate for any period of time. If a problem is subsequentlhy identified 2 by PHE then it makes it particulary difficult to check if particular products have been implicated. 2. Similary there is no legal requirement of Hospital Trusts to send in Listeria isolates when Listeria has been identified. This therefore does not allow PHE to match particular strains and identify outbreaks which are connected earlier. 3. In both these circumcumstances this leads to missed opportunities to deal with any outbreak.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2020-0159
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use