“During the Inquest, evidence was heard that: - 1”
Dated 15 Jan 2020, from the coroner for Manchester West. Sent to 1 organisation or person.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
Report put online after its 56 daysOrganisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
judiciary.uk put this report online on 8 Apr 2020, after the 56 days for replies had ended (11 Mar 2020). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated15 Jan 2020
- Deadline11 Mar 2020
- Published on judiciary.uk8 Apr 2020
- Today23 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust” | Report put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 8 Apr 2020, after the 56 days for replies had ended (11 Mar 2020). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. |
The coroner’s concerns
This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.
During the Inquest, evidence was heard that: - 1. Staff were unaware of the situations where it was appropriate to breach Patient confidentiality and notify family or friends, when concems arose regarding patient safety/welfare. 2. Ward staff needed to have a greater understanding of how to prioritise New admissions and ensure the better flow of patients through the ward 3. Ward staff and ward doctors need to have a greater understanding of each other's roles and responsibilities in relation to managing patient risk and whose responsibilty itis to authorise leave and ensuring contemporaneous documentation are kept in relation to the decision making rationale (documenting any changes in risk and capacity). 4. Doctors and ward staff involved in making decisions about self - discharge should consider the circumstances of admission as well as Current risks when making decisions around discharge. They also need a greater understanding of the circumstances when it is appropriate to Seek more senior opinions in regards to whether the patients meets the criteria to be detained under the Mental Health Act, section 5 (2) and ensuring contemporaneous documentation are kept in relation to their decision making rationale. T request that you undertake a review to ensure staff receive the appropriate training on the issues identified above. 6 | ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion urgent action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe that you have the power to take such action. 7 | YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 11 March 2020. I, the Coroner, may extend the period.
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2020-0072
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use