Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2020-0041

“S are as follows: A”

Dated 21 Feb 2020, from the coroner for Hampshire (Central). Sent to 3 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 17 Apr 2020. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated21 Feb 2020
  2. Deadline17 Apr 2020
  3. Published on judiciary.uk9 Mar 2020
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Central and North West London NHS Foundation TrustResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in March 2020.
HM PrisonDeadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 17 Apr 2020. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
NHSDeadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 17 Apr 2020. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

S are as follows: A. The computer system used by CNWL is known as SystmOne. Healthcare staff working on Reception when Mr Goldstraw first arrived at the prison had access to his previous medical notes and history (around 240 pages in all) stored on SystmOne. The records contained numerous references to suicidal ideation and previous attempts at deliberate self-harm. Mr Goldstraw had attempted to take his own life on several previous occasions, the most recent of which was only three months prior to his arrival at the prison. However, despite a proliferation of entries making reference to his mental health history the mental health nurse who had access to SystmOne was seemingly unaware of the relevant entries. Had he been, he said he would have opened an ACCT. SystmOne makes it difficult for a doctor or mental health nurse to ascertain the key information needed to undertake a risk assessment and to decide whether or not to open an ACCT. Too much reliance is placed on the individual prisoners presentation and how he answeres a series of pre-set questions. At best, SystmOne makes it difficult for a mental health nurse to ascertain the relevant information and at worst it actively misleads them. For example, a search can be made of the "Journal" section but this would rely on the exact words being searched (ich settler or “deliberate self-harm") and it would then be necessary to go through the various entries (in Mr Goldstraw's case spread over 111 pages) using the "Key Word Search” function. Further, the functions that would (on the face of it) serve to assist in this situation (such as the "Summary" page or "Active Problems" section) were not populated with the information relevant to an accurate assessment. It was conceded by the legal representatives acting on behalf of CNWL that the "Summary" section is “very limited in its contents" and is not routinely used by healthcare staff within the prison in order to gain an insight into a prisoner's past medical history. The “Active Problems" section of SystmOne is subdivided in to a number of distinct areas and it appears to be wholly inadequate in terms of identifying key areas of concern such as the tisk of suicide or deliberate self-harm. The only information contained in the "Active Problems" section of SystmOne in Mr Goldstraw's case was four years out of date. None of the relevant information was contained in "Active Problems" but a great deal of irrelevant information was there! The "Communications" section of SystmOne contains a chronological record of correspondence with the hospital, GP surgery and psychiatric units. However, the "Key Word Search" facility does not function at all and short of going through all of the correspondence there is no way of identifying the key information needed to undertake an effective risk assessment. The "Communications" section in Mr Goldstraw's case amounted to 83 pages. Although the relevant information concerning Mr Goldstraw's mental health issues was contained within the "Communications" section of SystmOne there was no way of easily extracting it. Accordingly, a busy, under pressure mental health nurse or doctor is very likely to struggle to find the relevant entries using SystmOne, which may explain why (in Mr Goldstraw's case) too much reliance was placed on how he presented during interview. A prisoner who chooses not to disclose his true state of mind or suicidal ideation is unlikely to come to the notice of the healthcare staff whose job it is to identify the risk that he may pose to himself because SystmOne does not facilitate this. There also appeared to be a lack of training in relation to the effective use of SystmOne. In particular, it was not clear whether any steps had been taken to ensure that the staff who were working at the prison at the time of Mr Goldstraw's death had been retrained or had their competencies assessed in light of the failures identified. There is a real concern that some staff are still failing adequately to carry out assessments of a prisoners risk of suicide / deliberate self-harm. Coroner's Office Castle Hill, The Castle, Winchester, SO23 8UL Tel: 01962-667884 Email: western-hampshire.coroners@hants.acsx.gov.uk H. The Head of Healthcare at HM Prison, Winchester has indicated that she intends to provide (in conjunction with the Prison Governor) a joint learning bulletin to all staff, stressing the importance or sharing information, most notably in reception and during the early days in custody. However, this does not address the technical shortcomings of SystmOne which present a matter of considerable concern, even if healthcare staff undertake all reasonable steps to ascertain a prisoner's previous mental health history as part of the prison induction process. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 17% April 2020. |, the coroner, may extend the period.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2020-0041
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use