Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2019-0482

“During the Inquest, evidence was heard that:- 1,Salford Royal Hospital had undertaken an…”

Dated 16 Oct 2019, from the coroner for Manchester West. Sent to 3 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 11 Dec 2019. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated16 Oct 2019
  2. Deadline11 Dec 2019
  3. Published on judiciary.uk16 Oct 2019
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Salford Royal Hospital NHS Trust”Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in October 2019.
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory AgencyDeadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 11 Dec 2019. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
Nursing and Midwifery CouncilDeadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 11 Dec 2019. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

During the Inquest, evidence was heard that:- 1,Salford Royal Hospital had undertaken an internal investigation and Concluded that one of the root causes for the medication error, was the Phosphate Polyfusor product design. i, The Pharmacy and Nursing Matron Lead, concurred that the staff involved in the incident had relied on the word Polyfusor, without actually checking the medication packaging against the prescription chart and label. Salford Royal Hospital, wrote to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in 2018, requesting the word Polyfusor be removed from the Phosphate design product packaging to prevent future medication errors. Despite repeated requests from Salford Royal Hospital for an MHRA update, the product design for Phosphate Polyfusor remains the same. 2. I request that The Chief Executive, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) reviews the: i, Product design on the Polyfusors in question | 3.The Chief Executive, Nursing & Midwifery Council, 23 Portland Place, London 2 W1B 1PZ reviews the: I.Guidance given to their members in relation to the administration of medication to consider and include the simplest of steps, namely that a Healthcare Professional should check the name of the medication on the prescription chart against the name of the medication on the packaging and labelling of the medication at the time of each administration of medication to ensure that the correct medication is always administered to a patient. li.Guidance given to their members in relation to their duties, to accurately record and contemporaneously document the packaging, label an prescription checks they have undertaken to ensure the correct medication is always administered to a patient. 4.The Chief Executive, Salford Royal Hospital, NHS Trust Hospital, Stott Lane, Salford M6 8HD reviews the: i.Guidance and procedures in relation to the dispensing and transfer of medications from the Pharmacy Department to a ward, to include a system of checking medications against the packaging, labelling and prescription chart at the time of receipt by the ward. Furthermore, to consider documentary evidence of the fact that the medication packaging has been checked against the prescription chart and an acknowledgement of receipt of the correct medication by the pharmacy and ward staff, evidenced by a signature of the recipient. li. Training, Auditing, Supervision and monitoring of all staff, particularly Nursing and Pharmacy staff, in relation to the above issues.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2019-0482
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use