Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths

“| heard in evidence from Mr Young, the Trust's Clinical Director who had carried Out a…”

Dated 1 Nov 2018, from the coroner for Worcestershire. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 27 Dec 2018. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated1 Nov 2018
  2. Deadline27 Dec 2018
  3. Published on judiciary.uk1 Nov 2018
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustResponse published, not yet matchedA response is published with this report. We haven’t yet matched it to the organisation it’s from, so it may be this one’s.

Some responses were published as scans, so their text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

— (1) | heard in evidence from Mr Young, the Trust's Clinical Director who had carried Out a Root Cause Analysis, | heard also from one of the Trust's consultant neurosurgeons. Both consultants expressed their belief that neurosurgical patients of this nature required additional support from their consultant physician colleagues. | was told that this has been an issue for some time and remained unresolved. In particular, there was concern that a junior neurosurgical doctor was left to implement an alcohol withdrawal regimen. | was. told that these difficulties are mot confined to patients who are admitted with alcohol-related issues but extend across the whole range of neurosurgical patients who require medical input. (2) | was told that the aloohol withdrawal protocol was difficult to understand. This resulted in the doctor prescribing diazepam when Lorazepam should have been ued, | was told and shown an action plan that the Trust intends to implement to Improve [he process. (3) |*

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use