Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2019-0423

“That no-one appeared to have looked at his mental health except to note that he was…”

Dated 12 Dec 2019, from the coroner for Norfolk. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 6 Feb 2020. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated12 Dec 2019
  2. Deadline6 Feb 2020
  3. Published on judiciary.uk30 Dec 2019
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Norfolk & Suffolk NHS Trust”Deadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 6 Feb 2020. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

— (1) That no-one appeared to have looked at his mental health except to note that he was alcohol dependant. This was an escalating presentation from someone who had no previous contact with the services. (2) His mental state was not classed as a psychiatric illness and since he did not fit neatly under a label he was not taken on. When seen by the Crisis Home Resolution Treatment Team, home treatment was not offered or explored. His mother states that hospital admission was not offered and a referral to Wellbeing Services should have been made but wasn't. (3) The various teams within the Trust seem to be unaware of each other’s referral criteria and displayed little or no professional curiosity and appeared to dismiss his GP’s opinion which gave a clear description of his worsening presentation and the fact that he had been abstinent from alcohol.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2019-0423
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use