Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2019-0420

“The Investigation of the circumstances of the death has focused amongst other aspects on…”

Dated 6 Dec 2019, from the coroner for Gateshead and South Tyneside. Sent to 3 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 31 Jan 2020. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated6 Dec 2019
  2. Deadline31 Jan 2020
  3. Published on judiciary.uk30 Dec 2019
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “North East Ambulance Service NHS Trust”Deadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 31 Jan 2020. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
Northumbria Police ServiceDeadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 31 Jan 2020. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne & Wear NHS Trust”Deadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 31 Jan 2020. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

— The Investigation of the circumstances of the death has focused amongst other aspects on the control communications between Maureen and Ambulance control personnel with particular reference to the detail of the actual conversations had between Maureen and the personnel, the method of evaluating and grading of information elicited from Maureen In that process. it Is correct to acknowledge the NEAS is still undertaking its own investigation and evaluation of these matters with a view to publishing a report before the end of the current year, concerns have been identified around apparent missed opportunities to react In a different or more timely manner to the facts and detail being presented in the course of these calls. Central to these concerns are that a period of 3.45 hours elapsed between the first call and the arrival of an Ambulance crew at Maureen’s side. Whilst explanations around lack of resources and even possibly inadvertent allocation and/or interpretation of data may feature in the NEAS subsequent report by way of explanation of this delay, the real and imminent danger of Maureen’s admitted actions does not appear to have been appreciated and readily reacted to in a meaningful way given the danger they clearly presented. An apparent toxicological aid was either unappreciated or misinterpreted as an under assessed and immediate event- the need was obvious a} No enquiry was made of Maureen as to the nature of her location and the potential support or assistance readily at hand or otherwise. b) No further enquiries were made to identify familial or social support which might or could have been enlisted or alerted to her presenting danger c}) No NEAS protocol appears to exist to assist personnel to initiate a response other than one limited to and directing an ambulance allocation d) No working arrangement appears to exist to enlist the aid of other Agencies to support the patient or react more directly and in timely way to monitor and evaluate the nature of the presenting danger. There appears to be a need for a closer liaison and working relationship between Emergency Services which Is sufficiently robust to react and present early support to the patient there having been such an accurate evaluation of an otherwise obvious developing critical situation and particularly if delays in reaction otherwise may also be apparent.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2019-0420
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use