Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2019-0310

“6 (1) There appeared to be some inconsistency as to approach to be taken amongst the…”

Dated 24 Sep 2019, from the coroner for South Wales Central. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 19 Nov 2019. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated24 Sep 2019
  2. Deadline19 Nov 2019
  3. Published on judiciary.uk5 Nov 2019
  4. Today22 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health BoardResponse published, not yet matchedA response is published with this report. We haven’t yet matched it to the organisation it’s from, so it may be this one’s.

Some responses were published as scans, so their text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

The coroner’s concerns

– 6 (1) There appeared to be some inconsistency as to approach to be taken amongst the Nursing staff/Health Care Assistants as to when entries should be made in the FACE records following interaction with a patient. It is considered that some guidance/training on this issue would be of benefit to promote greater consistency (2) Erroneously completed NEWS charts – it transpired that Nursing Staff/HCA’s were using the frequency of observation box, to record the time observations were carried out. This may require guidance/training to remind staff completing the NEWS charts of the importance of ensuring the appropriate boxes are completed. (3) Missed Observations – It transpired that NEWS observations ought to have been undertaken at around 7.30am on 8.2.17. There was no record that they had. Whilst there appeared to be systems in place to prompt Nurses/HCA’s to undertake the observations on time – enhanced observations recorded on a white board & the NEWS charts of those patients receiving enhanced observations being separated on the Nursing station, these did not achieve the desired outcome here. It is suggested that more robust ( possibly linked to FACE) procedures should be considered to ensure the observations are performed on time (4) ECG Requests – plan on 8.2.17 was for an ECG to be undertaken. There was no evidence that it had, or had been requested – not documented. The system in place for requesting ECG’s – routine or otherwise appeared somewhat ad hoc and it is suggested that a more robust system for documenting & requesting ECG’s should be considered & implemented. (5) It was considered that some of the detail provided by Nurses/HCA’s when completing the 15 minute observations chart was inadequate. In particular entries such as “bed”. It was accepted that such information was inadequate & a brief addendum adding the condition of the patient was desirable – i.e. recording not simply where a patient was located at the time, but also their state – calm, agitated, sleeping, etc. It was felt that guidance/training on the appropriate completion of these observation charts was indicated, so that patterns of physical & mental health symptoms could be assessed. (6) Consideration should be given to the creation & use of a policy within the Trust for managing opiate dependant patients in the acute admission setting. Whilst the absence of such a policy is unlikely to have altered the outcome here, it was agreed by the Head of Mental Health Nursing that such a policy would be worthy of consideration, to assist clinicians & nurses faced with treating such patients. Such policies are in place in the Aneurin Bevan UHB & C & V UHB, as well as several HB’s in England

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2019-0310
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use