Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2019-0132

“The evidence before the court suggested that Mrs Dixon was not accompanied or escorted by…”

Dated 5 Apr 2019, from the coroner for Surrey. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Report put online after its 56 days

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

judiciary.uk put this report online on 18 Jun 2019, after the 56 days for replies had ended (31 May 2019). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated5 Apr 2019
  2. Deadline31 May 2019
  3. Published on judiciary.uk18 Jun 2019
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Ashford and St Peter’s Hospitals NHS Trust”Report put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 18 Jun 2019, after the 56 days for replies had ended (31 May 2019). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online.

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

1. The evidence before the court suggested that Mrs Dixon was not accompanied or escorted by a medical professional to the radiography suite. 2. Her daughter was not invited into the room when the pre-scan form was completed. 3. The consent form was filled in by the radiographer on asking questions of Mrs Dixon alone who was vulnerable, unwell, confused and hard of hearing in an unfamiliar environment without assistance. 4. The consent form was also supplemented with information from the computer records but it was not clear on the form or in evidence which information came from Mrs Dixon and which from records. 5. Part of the consent form was filled in and initialled by a person who cannot be identified by the Trust as to which member of staff it was. 6. Part of the consent form about previous contrast was left blank and although the RCA had the information before the scan it was not noted. 7. The radiographer who filled in the form had no training in communication or language difficulties and there were no other resources to aid communication and the questions were yes/no. 8. No notes were made in the radiography suite. 9. Mrs Dixon was assessed before attending the radiography suite but there was no one with clinical skills to assess her prior to the scan itself and . 10. There was no note to assist the radiographer with any vulnerabilities Mrs Dixon had (including crucially hearing and understanding difficulties and that she was not able to lie flat) 11. The way the room was set up it was difficult for the radiographer to realise that Mrs Dixon was having breathing difficulties during the scan as he was only able to see the top of her head and it was hard for him to hear over the sound of the scanner through the intercom in the scanner itself.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2019-0132
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use