Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2019-0060

“The Mangar Elk inflatable chair was intended to be used to lift Mr Chandler to the…”

Dated 21 Feb 2019, from the coroner for Norfolk. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

All responses published

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated21 Feb 2019
  2. Deadline18 Apr 2019
  3. Published on judiciary.uk26 May 2019
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
East of England Ambulance Service NHS TrustNamed in the report as “East of England Ambulance Service”Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in May 2019.

Some responses were published as scans, so their text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

— (1) The Mangar Elk inflatable chair was intended to be used to lift Mr Chandler to the ambulance. One section did not inflate and so Mr Chandler was lifted underneath his arms and transferred to a chair borrowed from a local supermarket, no pain relief was given to Mr Chandler before being placed into the ambulance. He was later diagnosed with a pneumothorax. No safety straps were used. (2) Staff are required to ask for assistance when required and are responsible for checking equipment daily. The evidence is that this is not always done. (3) An electronic tablet was used initially to record the incident but this was not sufficiently charged to record all information. Paper records were not adequately completed. (4) The incident occurred in September 2018 and the internal investigation report with recommendations was completed in January 2019. Recommendations within the Report and in particular a clinical debrief had not taken place at the time of inquest (February 2019) -ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe your organisation has the power to take such action.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2019-0060
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use