Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2019-0027

“I received evidence that on the facts of this case, the latest time that Mrs Bailey could…”

Dated 23 Jan 2019, from the coroner for Lincolnshire. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Report put online after its 56 days

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

judiciary.uk put this report online on 23 May 2019, after the 56 days for replies had ended (20 Mar 2019). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated23 Jan 2019
  2. Deadline20 Mar 2019
  3. Published on judiciary.uk23 May 2019
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
United Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustNamed in the report as “United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust”Report put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 23 May 2019, after the 56 days for replies had ended (20 Mar 2019). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online.

The coroner’s concerns

– A) I received evidence that on the facts of this case, the latest time that Mrs Bailey could have arrived at hospital with any realistic prospect of survival was 19.40 hours. Ultimately the decision to take her to Boston Pilgrim hospital was futile, although that was not known at the time. B) I also received evidence that two pre-alert calls were made by the travelling paramedics to Boston Pilgrim Hospital to advise of the serious nature of Mrs Bailey's condition, those calls being made at approximately 20.30 hours and at 20.42 hours. 1 C) I received evidence from Mr Bailey that upon arrival at hospital the clinicians appeared not to be ready for his wife's arrival. D) I received evidence from Mr , consultant in the Accident and Emergency Unit at Boston Pilgrim Hospital, that , a Specialty Doctor in Emergency medicine present at the time had noted in the medical records that he, together with other doctors had attempted to resuscitate Mrs Bailey who had presented to A & E in a collapsed state around 21.00 hours and had noted that " a cardiac arrest call-out had also been initiated in or around the time of the patient's arrival to Pilgrim." E) I received evidence from the locum registrar for the labour ward, that "[My understanding at that time was that] no Obstetrician and gynaecologist was forewarned about this patients arrival to the A & E department." F) The ED records confirmed that two pre alert calls were recorded but not dated nor signed. G) Whilst the severity of Mrs Bailey's condition meant that in the particular circumstances of this case the treatment Mrs Bailey received at hospital neither caused nor contributed to her death, the apparent breakdown in communication does raise an area of concern in relation to future emergency admissions. 6.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2019-0027
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use