“During the hearing it was noted that on a number of occasions record keeping was poor”
Dated 13 Nov 2018, from the coroner for Staffordshire (South). Sent to 2 organisations or people.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
Report put online after its 56 daysOrganisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
judiciary.uk put this report online on 12 Apr 2019, after the 56 days for replies had ended (8 Jan 2019). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated13 Nov 2018
- Deadline8 Jan 2019
- Published on judiciary.uk12 Apr 2019
- Today23 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust” | Report put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 12 Apr 2019, after the 56 days for replies had ended (8 Jan 2019). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. |
| Department of Health and Social Care | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in April 2019. |
The coroner’s concerns
This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.
(1) During the hearing it was noted that on a number of occasions record keeping was poor. This can make continuity of care difficult and it can lead to matters being missed. | wonder if the Trust can take any action to improve this. (2) It is apparent that patients do benefit from regular ‘ward rounds’ or ‘multi- disciplinary team meetings’ (there are a variety of titles) and, apart from the record of these meetings being very poor at times, there is a concern about the conduct of these meetings. In particular there appears to be on occasions inadequate consideration of the history in preparation for the meeting, failure of attendance of all appropriate personnel at such meetings and concern about the patient being able properly to participate. (3) It is clear that Clozapine is a beneficial drug for many patients and that a large number of patients in the care of the Trust do receive this drug. However it appears that many staff are not aware of the significance of this medication particularly when considering potential side-effects and warning signs of deterioration. (4) | would not wish for patients or their families to be overloaded with paperwork but | wonder if there could be a simple leaflet available to patients and family members covering standard information about treatment generally but including matters such as the dangers of patients smoking whilst they are receiving Clozapine. (5) | wonder if there needs to be a review of any lone-working policy or procedure with particular reference as to when to enter patients’ rooms. (6) It is well known that it is important for lessons to be learnt following serious incidents. The SIR procedure is a significant part of this. | understand there have been some changes since the time of Tom’s death but the SIR carried out in this matter contained a number of significant inaccuracies which can affect the validity of the process. Additionally although the records for patients who are in hospital for a long period of time can become voluminous there has also been some difficulty in disclosure of significant documents during the Inquest process.
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2018-0352
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use