Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2018-0349

“John Lee developed an abdominal aortic aneurysm which had become enlarged”

Dated 19 Oct 2018, from the coroner for Mid Kent and Medway. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Report put online after its 56 days

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

judiciary.uk put this report online on 12 Apr 2019, after the 56 days for replies had ended (14 Dec 2018). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated19 Oct 2018
  2. Deadline14 Dec 2018
  3. Published on judiciary.uk12 Apr 2019
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Medway NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Medway NHS Trust”Report put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 12 Apr 2019, after the 56 days for replies had ended (14 Dec 2018). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online.

The coroner’s concerns

– John Lee developed an abdominal aortic aneurysm which had become enlarged. His GP wrote an urgent referral letter to the appropriate hospital specialist department requesting a vascular assessment. That letter was considered the next day by a specialist nurse at Medway Maritime Hospital, who after conferring with a consultant vascular surgeon graded the referral as urgent, endorsed the GP letter with the words “next vascular slot Maidstone” and passed that letter to a clerk or secretary to fix the appointment. The nurse’s evidence was that the Trust had a policy to see such patients within 2 weeks, that vascular clinics were conducted on a Monday and that therefore her intention had been that Mr Lee would be seen on the subsequent Monday. If that had been the “next” Monday, the appointment would have been within 5 days of grading. Due to a clerical error which was admitted but not explained, the secretary allocated Mr Lee to an appointment 5 weeks later than the “next” Monday. When Mr Lee attended that appointment, his aneurysm had become tender and the consultant admitted him for an emergency procedure. The next day Mr Lee died on the operating table, as a consequence of uncontrollable haemorrhaging and ventricular tachycardia, following otherwise successful reduction of the aneurysm and insertion of Dacron graft. Expert opinion was accepted to the effect that if Mr Lee had been seen within 2 weeks of referral as intended, he could have been managed as an elective procedure, allowing for early stopping of his Clopidogrel medication, better precautionary control of a cardiac arrythmia and a less acute situation. (1) The use of the expression “next vascular slot” is uncertain and open to mis-interpretation (2) There should be provision for the direct input of clinical grade staff in setting clinical especially urgent appointments (3) There should be consideration given to a checking procedure to guard against human error or misunderstanding of priority

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2018-0349
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use