Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2018-0322

“After his birth Joseph was transferred to the neonatal unit at St Mary's due to the…”

Dated 18 Oct 2018, from the coroner for Manchester South. Sent to 3 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Report put online after its 56 days

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

judiciary.uk put this report online on 24 Feb 2019, after the 56 days for replies had ended (13 Dec 2018). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated18 Oct 2018
  2. Deadline13 Dec 2018
  3. Published on judiciary.uk24 Feb 2019
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Department of Health and Social CareReport put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 24 Feb 2019, after the 56 days for replies had ended (13 Dec 2018). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online.
Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustReport put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 24 Feb 2019, after the 56 days for replies had ended (13 Dec 2018). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online.
Health Services Safety Investigations BodyNamed in the report as “Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch”Report put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 24 Feb 2019, after the 56 days for replies had ended (13 Dec 2018). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online.

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

— 1. After his birth Joseph was transferred to the neonatal unit at St Mary's due to the complexities of his health. Following his discharge, it took 6 weeks for the trust to send the discharge paperwork to the GP and the District General Hospital (DGH) to whom they were transferring his paediatric care. As a result, there was no clear understanding amongst health professionals as to the paediatrician with responsibility for his care. Letters were therefore copied into a mixture of paediatricians. The discharge letter to the DGH was addressed to a consultant who was in fact a registrar at the trust. 2. Joseph was under the care of the paediatric neurosurgical team at the Royal Manchester Children's Hospital (RMCH). Letters from the neurosurgical team following out-patient appointments took 4 weeks to be ‘sent out. As a result one letter to a paediatric anaesthetist asking for an examination was not typed until after the operation was due to take place. When his mother took him for review, she had to escalate the need for him to be seen by the paediatric anaesthetist who then deemed him not fit at that time for surgery. 3. ALENT appointments and neurosurgery appointments at the RMCH, Joseph was seen without the paper notes because they had not been made available to the clinicians seeing Joseph. 4. Joseph had been diagnosed by the neurosurgeons at RMCH with neural tube defect (cervical meningocele, hydrocephalus, Amold Chiari | type II malformation. A recognised complication is hydrocephalus. Identification of the onset of hydrocephalus is through measurement of head circumference. The inquest heard that when Joseph was discharged from St Mary's the neurosurgical team did not send written instructions to community health professionals explaining what was required and why it was required. The midwives measuring his head were unsure why they were measuring it or what to do with the information. 5. Joseph's health needs relating to neural tube defect (cervical | meningocele, hydrocephalus, Amold Chiari type II malformation and laryngomalacia were dealt with by the RMCH. His paediatric care was transferred without discussion by St Mary's back to the DGH. The inquest was told that there is no set protocol/ procedure between tertiary centres and DGH's for this situation, which can lead to differing practices. 6. Joseph's red book had been completed sporadically. The inquest heard from a number of witnesses who indicated that practice re completion of the red book amongst health professionals nationally was mixed and that there was no clear guidance for or expectation amongst health professionals that they would be widely used other than for post birth weight recording and immunisations. As a result there was no composite record of health concerns for a young child such as Joseph. Differing IT systems meant that health professionals in different trusts were reliant on verbal information passed to parents placing a significant burden on parents and a risk that key information was not available.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2018-0322
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use