“are: How MASH reports are processed by the MASH team upon receipt; Whether there is an…”
Dated 8 May 2018, from the coroner for Surrey. Sent to 3 organisations or people.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
Deadline passedReplies were due by 3 Jul 2018. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.
- Report dated8 May 2018
- Deadline3 Jul 2018
- Published on judiciary.uk1 Jul 2018
- Today23 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Surrey & Borders Partnership NHS Trust” | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in July 2018. |
| Surrey County Council | Deadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 3 Jul 2018. A reply may have been sent and not yet published. |
| Surrey Police | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in July 2018. |
Some responses were published as scans, so their text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.
The coroner’s concerns
are: How MASH reports are processed by the MASH team upon receipt; Whether there is an effective system in place to ensure that MASH reports are followed up by the appropriate Community Mental Health Team (where necessary); and Whether there is an effective system in place to deal appropriately with MASH referrals received outside normal weekday office hours, and that those completing the MASH referral forms (e.g. Police officers) know where these should be send outside normal working hours when a high risk is identified Consideration should be given to whether any steps can be taken to address the above concerns.
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2018-0140
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use