“During the inquest evidence was heard that: vi”

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

1. During the inquest evidence was heard that: vi. vil. Mrs Richardson was under the care of the Dorset Healthcare University Foundation Trust (DHUFT) in relation to her mental health. Her latest period of treatment began in June 2017. She was under the care of the Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) from that time until the time of her death on the 26" September 2017. The CMHT had referred her to the West Dorset Steps to Wellbeing Service for therapy. She was assessed by the Psychiatrist from the CMHT on the 13% July 2017, 8" August 2017 and 23 August 2017. The Psychiatrist left the Trust and her case was then managed by a Nurse Prescriber who assessed her on the 19'* September 2017. During these assessments, her risk of harm was deemed to be low. She was reviewed by the Steps to Wellbeing Service on the 21* August 2017 when she was in low mood and had thoughts, but no plans, of ending her life. The team felt that her risk was too high for treatment by the Service and they therefore intended to refer her back to CMHT. Mrs Richardson was only advised of this in writing in a letter dated the 21 September. The details of that assessment were never referred to the CMHT. They were therefore not aware of how she presented or the risk assessment made by the Steps to Wellbeing Service. This information could have been very valuable to those in the CMHT who assessed her on the 23" August and 19" September. Evidence was given that some of the Steps to Wellbeing Service have access to DHUFT records, namely RIO records, but not all of them do. Evidence was further given that they do not write entries in these records. Those carrying out assessments therefore are not likely to have access to all information available to DHUFT in relation to the patient. Further on the 28" August 2017, Mrs Richardson contacted the Crisis Team within DHUFT stating that she had suicidal thoughts of ending her life by hanging. A call was made from the Crisis Team to the CMHT and a Community Psychiatric Nurse was spoken to. There was however no follow up after this, or any written communication with anyone involved in her care. Valuable information therefore, in relation to a patient, is not being communicated to those involved in the care. There does not appear to be joined up working between the different teams within the Trust. This could therefore lead to inaccurate risk assessments and a future death. 2. Ihave concerns with regard to the following: i. That there is a lack of communication between the different teams in DHUFT in respect of a patient’s care and as a result there could be the death of a person in the future. ii. | I would therefore request that there is a review of the policies by DHUFT in relation to the communication between the different teams within DHUFT, particularly between the CMHT and the Steps to Wellbeing Service.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source

judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2018-0134

Added to Minute Book

8 Oct 2026

Reuse

We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0