“During the inquest evidence was heard that: Mrs Spark was a lady who suffered with her…”

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

1. During the inquest evidence was heard that: Mrs Spark was a lady who suffered with her mental health and she had been engaging with Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust (DHUFT) since 2009. On the 25" August 2017 she was admitted to the Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth having taken an overdose of medication. She was assessed by the Psychiatric Liaison Team who are part of DHUFT and was discharged to the Crisis team within DHUFT. She was seen daily by the Crisis team and during the visits they decided to change her medication regime so that the administration of this was supervised by the Crisis team staff. This decision was made in relation to the medication for her mental health. Mrs Spark was however also prescribed medication for her physical health, On the 3 September she sadly died from an overdose of prescribed medication. Evidence was given that although the GP is written to when there is a change in regime regarding the mental health medication, there is no action taken in relation to the physical health medication. This may be a matter for the GP to resolve but if a patient’s access to medication is to be immediately changed by DHUFT employees, this should be addressed in relation to all medication not just mental health medication. I heard evidence from the Psychiatric Liaison Team Lead and the Crisis Team Lead that there does not appear to be a policy in place at the Trust to deal with the communication of the supervision of physical health medication. If there is such a policy, they advised me that they are not aware of it. Once the access to medication has been identified as a risk to a patient and there is a need for the taking of it to be supervised, access to, and the taking of, all medication, not just mental health medication, should be supervised. 2. Ihave concerns with regard to the following: That there is no policy in place in relation to the supervision of prescribed physical health medication when a decision has been made to supervise the administration of prescribed mental health mediation. I would therefore request that DHUFT review their policies regarding the supervision of all medication a patient is prescribed and when and how to alert GPs, or other treating practitioners, regarding changes to mediation regimes and supervision. If there is already such a policy in place to deal with both physical health and mental health mediation, then I would request that refresher training is undertaken to ensure all staff are made aware of the policy and the procedures to be adapted in such circumstances.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source

judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2018-0109

Added to Minute Book

8 Oct 2026

Reuse

We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0