Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2018-0021

“Need for clear information to be given by hospital staff wnen making the 999 call to…”

Dated 18 Jan 2018, from the coroner for West Sussex. Sent to 2 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

All responses published

Replies were due by 15 Mar 2018.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated18 Jan 2018
  2. Deadline15 Mar 2018
  3. Published on judiciary.uk14 Mar 2018
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Sussex Partnership NHS Trust”Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in March 2018.
Sussex PoliceResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in March 2018.

Some responses were published as scans, so their text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

- 1) Need for clear information to be given by hospital staff wnen making the 999 call to report a patient has gone AWOL in order to proactively answer the known risk questions and maximise the opportunity for police to take timely action to trace the patient within the golden hour. | heard from GE service Director, that when a 999 call is made relevant information would need to be drawn from several sources including the patient’s form (personal/physical details & photo), any signing in/out form (last known clothing) and latest risk assessments/plan with details of recent incidents that inform the risk assessment. Inevitably, when a patient goes missing the AWOL policy needs to be followed including internal and external searches; notification of relevant senior staff etc. At times of pressure such as these it would be advisable to have all the relevant information in one location for ease of access by the designated person who makes the call. 2) Langley Green to ensure that hospital CCTV is accessible at all times for police viewing. 3) Langley Green to consid amendment of current AWOL policy. This may be necessary given indication that he does not believe staff need to wait to have a discussion with clinical staff. 4) Police to ensure the initial risk assessment is clearly endorsed in the CAD and timely actions are undertaken both locally and appropriate referrals are made to other Forces. 5) Police to consider joint policy with Adult Safeguarding Board. 6) Police to consider equal response to informal as well as sectioned patients if guided by clinical staff of high risk. | heard from senior staff at Langley Green that there is a discernibly different response from police when the missing person is an informal patient rather than under a MHA order. In the latter case, often a blue light police car is immediately dispatched to the hospital and a room/locality search takes place. This is not the case with an informal patient yet the same high risk of self-harm or suicide or risk of causing injuries to others may exist. In other words, there seems to- be a general perception that informal patients are less unwell.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2018-0021
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use