Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2017-0369

“, - (1) In this case there was confusion as to whether on an in-patient transfer there…”

Dated 13 Dec 2017, from the coroner for Avon. Sent to 3 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Report put online after its 56 days

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

judiciary.uk put this report online on 11 Feb 2018, after the 56 days for replies had ended (7 Feb 2018). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated13 Dec 2017
  2. Deadline7 Feb 2018
  3. Published on judiciary.uk11 Feb 2018
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS TrustNamed in the report as “Avon & Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust”Report put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 11 Feb 2018, after the 56 days for replies had ended (7 Feb 2018). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online.
Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Dorset Healthcare University NHS Trust”Report put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 11 Feb 2018, after the 56 days for replies had ended (7 Feb 2018). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online.
NHS EnglandReport put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 11 Feb 2018, after the 56 days for replies had ended (7 Feb 2018). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online.

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

, - (1) In this case there was confusion as to whether on an in-patient transfer there should be a Form 2 to go alongside the Form 1 procedure. As well as clarifying this process with all providers concerned consideration should be given thata élear documerited process is put in place for in-patient transfers so that all those involved understand clearly the situation and the decision made in relation to the - patient. ‘ (2) Consideration should be given to ensuring that all care plans are time specific .-. so that dates of meetings or dates for tasks to be completed are set at the time of the meeting so again expectations are managed and everyone knows exactly what the plan is and when actions will occur. , (3) That the issue of inconsistent terminology when assessing risk is reviewed fo ensure a consistent approach. In this case there were a number of different phrases and grading’s used to determine the deceased's risk. (4) That consideration should be given to training and/or guidance issued for staff communicating with young persons by text or any means of social media. (5) Consideration should be given to reviewing whether there ought to be guidance issued when managing children who go out of area for psychiatric in patient care and further guidance issued in the management of children when returning to their local area when they have been an in-patient out of area. Whether certain steps should be taken to ensure best practice and a consistent approach e.g. risk assessing; face to face meetings; robust care planning; parental involvement: how best to re-integrate back into the local area/team.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2017-0369
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use