Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2017-0336

“e That a child as ill as James will again be moved from the Emergency Department to the…”

Dated 21 Jul 2017, from the coroner for Nottinghamshire. Sent to 3 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Report put online after its 56 days

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

judiciary.uk put this report online on 2 Dec 2017, after the 56 days for replies had ended (15 Sep 2017). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated21 Jul 2017
  2. Deadline15 Sep 2017
  3. Published on judiciary.uk2 Dec 2017
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospital NHS Trust”Report put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 2 Dec 2017, after the 56 days for replies had ended (15 Sep 2017). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online.
Bassetlaw Clinical Commissioning GroupReport put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 2 Dec 2017, after the 56 days for replies had ended (15 Sep 2017). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online.
Care Quality CommissionReport put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 2 Dec 2017, after the 56 days for replies had ended (15 Sep 2017). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online.

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

e That a child as ill as James will again be moved from the Emergency Department to the ward or Assessment Unit at the Hospital, rather than being transferred out for ongoing care — there is no reassurance that a sick child will be seen by a Consultant Paediatrician in the Emergency Department to assist with this decision e That the ‘red fiag’ signs of sepsis will not be recognized and acted upon by the Paediatric team unless there is further training and awareness raising. | suggest The Paediatric Consultant team access external training and mentoring by senior colleagues ideally within their Critical Care network. that there is still no protocol for face to face medical handover that the Consultant team have rejected a model of care that encourages frank discussion with nursing and other staff on the ward, aimed at helping all staff speak up when worried about a deteriorating child (the RCPCH SAFE model) — e the level of Paediatric staffing at Bassetlaw Hospital. | understand there is often only one junior doctor available, and that the middle grade doctor is on duty for 24 hours.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2017-0336
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use