“My Narrative Conclusion as expanded in my summing up detailed a number of failings the…”
Dated 26 May 2017, from the coroner for Wiltshire and Swindon. Sent to 3 organisations or people.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
Report put online after its 56 daysOrganisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
judiciary.uk put this report online on 31 Aug 2017, after the 56 days for replies had ended (21 Jul 2017). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated26 May 2017
- Deadline21 Jul 2017
- Published on judiciary.uk31 Aug 2017
- Today23 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Great Western NHS Hospital Trust” | Report put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 31 Aug 2017, after the 56 days for replies had ended (21 Jul 2017). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. |
| Chippenham Community Hospital | Report put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 31 Aug 2017, after the 56 days for replies had ended (21 Jul 2017). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. |
| Wiltshire Council | Report put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 31 Aug 2017, after the 56 days for replies had ended (21 Jul 2017). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. |
The coroner’s concerns
This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.
— My Narrative Conclusion as expanded in my summing up detailed a number of failings the majority contributing to Doreen’s death. The outstanding concerns which | would like each of the recipients where designated to consider and which are listed below in no order of severity or importance are as follows:- a) (Wiltshire Council) When Doreen was admitted to hospital on 20" December 2015 the paramedics made a safeguarding referral to Wiltshire Council. Due to the fact that the admission took place on a Sunday the referral fax was sent to the Emergency Out of Hours Team. | was satisfied having heard a copy of the recording that South Western Ambulance Service also followed up that fax with a telephone call to the Emergency Sevices Team who confirmed that the fax had been received. It appears that in triaging the referral that it was signed off on the basis that Doreen had been admitted to The Great Western iii Ts Adult Safeguarding Manager at Wiltshire Council, who confirmed my suspicion that in relation to the self-neglect issues that they would ordinarily have been left for the team at Athelston House to address as that from a common sense point of view would be the most appropriate way forward. There however remained the issue as regards the possible financial abuse by a Carer of Doreen. | am concerned here as regards the procedures in place to ensure that safeguarding referrals are properly investigated and whilst | was satisfied that what happened here did not contribute to Doreen’s death | am concerned that a safeguarding issue was not followed up and in fact was signed off in circumstances when clearly it should not have been. | would like you to look into this matter with a view to reviewing what went wrong and providing assurances as regards what measures may be introduced to minimise the risk of this happening again in the future or if no action is proposed to be taken, why no action is to be taken; b) (Great Western Hospital) In considering the evidence when Doreen was discharged from The Great Western Hospital initially on the 21° “ December 2015, she was sent with a discharge letter and a 4 page Medivo Summary summarising the paramedics’ attendance on the 20" December 2015. Of note that summary did not contain any information that the paramedic had undertaken a 6CIT Cognitive evaluation of Doreen and that she had failed that assessment. One can never guarantee that another document will reflect the information contained in the initial report and therefore a possible way forward could be to ensure in cases where the turnaround through hospital is short that as part of the Discharge Package that it includes a copy of the Paramedic handwritten report that would have been provide to Great Western Hospital when she was admitted. It is however for you to consider how to resolve the concern here that an important bit of information was not provided to the team at Athelston House; c) (Wiltshire Council, Wiltshire Health & Care and Great Western Hospital) As a general comment, my view in relation to the quality and substance of case notes was that they were poor in quality. My investigation was hampered due to the fact that the Archiving System at Great Western Hospital for Doreen’s therapy led healthcare notes failed in that the notes or at least the scanned images were lost and were not available. Given that some notes were recorded on the Wiltshire Council Care First System and the evidence was that the Healthcare records would not have been significantly different my concerns remain. Crucial and important decisions did not contain any rationale as to why and the basis upon which that decision was being made. As indicated when | Wiltshire & Swindon Coroner's Office, 26 Endless Street, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP1 1DP Tel 01722 438900 | Fax 01722 332223 e) summed up the evidence my view is that recording a rationale can act as a check in relation to the decision making process itself as it forces the author to consider the process and information that has led to that decision being made. | also have concerns in relation to the way MDT’s work and reach decisions. The decisions very much appear to be a consensual decision amongst relevant members of the team as opposed to an individual making the decision based on information provided by relevant team members. There was no leadership. My concern as regards this consensual approach is that no-one actually takes ownership and responsibility for the decision itself and a consensual approach as evidenced in Doreen’s case can in my view lead to a situation whereby there is a false sense of reassurance in believing that nothing more could be done for Doreen that in this case led to wrong decisions being taken. (Wiltshire Health & Care) As part of the evidence | heard that Doreen in the opinion of an Expert Geriatric Psychiatrist, not only had a mental impairment (cognitive impairment more likely with underlying dementia) but also more importantly that in relation to a serious and complex decision to return home she was of the view, in respect of which | accepted, that more likely than not Doreen could not understand her needs and was unable to recognise the risk of refusing the safeguarding recommendations and that in relation to her decision to return home and those associated decisions that she did not have mental capacity. | indicated in my summing up that this was a difficult case but | feel that the training given especially to the Therapy led members of the team did not sufficiently prepare them to deal with very complicated cases such as Doreen’s although that having been said if the advice that had been given had been followed the outcome possibly would have been different. | was however satisfied that had the advice been followed and a capacity test undertaken that Doreen would not have returned home when she did and therefore would not have died when she did. It was_also readily apparent to me that members of the Therap
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2017-0169
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use