“The court was told that officers are not expected to read Standing Operating Procedures…”

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

- (1) The court was told that officers are not expected to read Standing Operating Procedures and the Officer Safety Manual, and there is little “required reading” or ready reference for police officers regarding restraint techniques and dangers. (2) Officers had been taught about Acute Behavioural Disturbance (ABD) but most did not recognise that Mr Lewis was suffering from ABD. , ‘The training on ABD appeared unnecessarily complicated and was not fully understood by officers. They incorrectly assumed that it was a formal diagnosis of some sort and that healthcare professionals would be able to recognise and treat the condition. An expert psychiatrist indicated that the description might be helpful for police in the community, particularly when the condition is caused by drugs, but it causes difficulty when police and mental health services work together and where the underlying cause is related to mental illness, The question that arose was whether it is necessary to attach a label at all. It might be more easily understood if officers are taught that people who resist restraint and appear to be suffering from mental illness may not respond as expected, and are therefore more vulnerable to die suddenly during restraint. (3) Police were taught that prolonged restraint was dangerous, but had no idea what “prolonged” meant, and were left to use their own judgement. They also seemed to think that prolonged restraint referred to time spent ina prone position and that as long as the detainee was held on his/her side the danger was ameliorated or removed. The pathological and psychiatric expert evidence clearly indicated that restraint in any position can lead to sudden death in patients who are highly agitated. The jury found that the police training was inadequate in its definition of “prolonged restraint” for people exhibiting signs of ABD. (4) Police officers were given no advice or training what they could or should do if control was not achieved within a given period of time. (5) There was no training or understanding about the respective roles and responsibilities of healthcare and police staff. There was (and still is) no Memorandum of Understanding. (6) The jury concluded that medical staff requested police assistance due toa lack of trained and physically able medical staff. The Trust had a policy for closing wards or placing them in special measures when training levels fell below a given level, but this was not followed and there was a lack of clarity around who was responsible for assessing compliance

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source

judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2017-0205

Added to Minute Book

8 Oct 2026

Reuse

We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0